Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Open Letters by Mersault's avatar

Shining City or Divided Land?

Why Ronald Reagan Would Reject Trump’s GOP

https://substack.com/home/post/p-148586140?r=4d7sow&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
Alastair Leith's avatar

leaving ethical and political philosophy aside, ditching Tim Waltz as running mate for Liz Cheney, who disowned her own sister for the simple fact of her being gay (according to writer’s of the movie Vice at least) something even her monster father hadn’t even done, and never disavow her father’s legacy, indeed Liz embraced it was pretty telling. I can only assume internal polling suggested that the “popularism left” message* wasn’t cutting through for Tim.

but even more suspect and ugly was Harris relentlessly platforming retired US Pentagon officials denouncing Trump as an unacceptable risk. I don’t know the personal positions these military leaders on USA invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan or pressuring Ukraine and Europe to isolate Russia or their positions on South China Seas, but the general position of the USA military establishment has been hawkish, so platforming these men on stage at rallies standing besides Harris was a confusing image if she wanted to suggest she was about “filling our hearts with hope and joy”. i can’t see it motivating those Bernie Sanders supporters disillusioned of the DNC establishment/elite or the Purple State normals who just suffered the triple whammy of Biden’s Administration removing the covid safety net (many poor people saved for the first time in their lives with that in place), watching basics goods rise 50%+ in two years with no wage increases, employment security no better than pre-covid, and interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve lifting the costs of them servicing their mortgage and personal debt up many-fold.

the real-politic of this alignment with the military establishment in the context of Gaza and Ukraine/Russian war just played into Trumps narrative that the Democrats are inherently part of the Deep State and that somehow the Deep State (a term often used by people like Julian Assange when he was commenting geopolitical issues) is an Liberals only project, which is a remarkably stupid idea given the deep Republican voting habits of US service people and deep ties between high ranking servicemen and servicewomen and the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) and Republican networks. I’m not saying the MIC/Deep State network it’s a GOP-only thing either, i’m saying it’s both high ranking Democratic Party figures and Republican figures deeply entwined into the neoliberal/liberal geopolitics of power projection abroad.

* i don’t know why they call it the “popularism” in the USA when anybody talks class politics, as if a) US politics isn’t a “popularity contest for ugly people” as the very ugly ALP leader Mark Latham once called it and b) policy being popular with normal people as opposed to elites and highly educated people is inherently suspicious (for sure when it comes to racism, sexism, ablism, ageism, etc it can be suspicious but that doesn’t make all policy with popular support, think medicare for all, inherently flawed, as dozens of nations have it working well and much more affordable than USA Health.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts