Taint is the wrong word imho. I would say "thankfully people will stop reading Chomsky's incoherent criticism of US foreign policy because of his relationship with Epstein"
Because this article is not about his Epstein connections but more importantly, how he has extremely terrible views and useless politics. I think people who follow him and his politics is much more dangerous.
I did mention his Epstein connections here. I will definitely elaborate on it later.
Excellent article. I read “American Power” many years ago and this resonates. Chomsky has always been terrible on prescription of solutions.
Thank you!
His legacy will be tainted by Epstein.
Taint is the wrong word imho. I would say "thankfully people will stop reading Chomsky's incoherent criticism of US foreign policy because of his relationship with Epstein"
Why didn't you feel the need to mention Chomsky's ubiquitous presence in the Epstein files in your actual article?
Because this article is not about his Epstein connections but more importantly, how he has extremely terrible views and useless politics. I think people who follow him and his politics is much more dangerous.
I did mention his Epstein connections here. I will definitely elaborate on it later.
https://www.historicly.net/p/colorless-green-ideas-sleep-furiously
Thanks for sharing this. I missed that earlier article. Makes sense!
Wow . I'm impressed by your insights and clarity! Thank you